Here's the link to the interview she did with me, if you want to know what I sound like:http://livingjoyfully.ca/blog/2016/07/eu029-what-learning-looks-like-with-meredith-novak/
And since I'm no good at speaking off-the-cuff, here's a transcript of my notes, which run pretty close to what I actually said on the podcast:
- 1. Can you share with us a bit about you and your family, and how you came to unschooling?MY SET-UP: The vast majority of unschooling parents come from a school background, me included, so that’s what learning looks like to us when we first start learning about unschooling. So I thought it would be helpful to compare and contrast what learning looks like in the school system and with unschooling. I came up with five aspects to compare that I think will be helpful.
So, I've always been interested in the
mind and the workings of the mind – everything: psychology,
neuroscience, chemistry, education, but also things like: meditation,
spirituality, linguistics, radical feminism, philosophy... you name
it. If it has to do with why and how people think and learn, I'm into
it.
And for awhile I lived sort of
communally with a bunch of folks in the hills of Tennessee, where I
kind of came into unschooling unintentionally, at least at first. My
stepson, Ray's bio parents wanted to homeschool him, so I ended up
involved with that and over time we kind of blundered our way toward
unschooling – especially in terms of parenting. Conventional
parenting really didn't work well for Ray and it turned out that the
kinder, more thoughtful and proactive we were able to be, the better
his life got. Then right around the time I was having my daughter,
Morgan, and starting to learn about unschooling online, we ended up
needing to put Ray in school for a few years. So Mo got to unschool
from the start and eventually Ray got to come home and unschool too,
when he was 13. So I've kind of had a range of home and unschooling
experiences and unschooling wins hands down in my book.
So much of the way parent-child
relationships are framed ends up being about teaching: about what we
want our kids to know and how we want our kids to be. That was
something that really surprised me about myself when I started
thinking about it. I had all these ideas about parenting that were
really more about me than about my kids. And since I'd always thought
of myself as someone who respected kids as people, it was kind of
disturbing. I had all this emotional energy invested in this fantasy
of what kind of mom I wanted to be and that was getting in the way of
actually understanding who my kids were and what they were telling me
about themselves.
That was especially true with Ray – I
had all these rules and expectations that of course were for his own
good, right? To make him into the best version of him that I could
imagine. And the further I got away from that, and the more I worked
on seeing him, for himself, the better things became. He was a pretty
intense kid, and all those rules and expectations – all the things
you're supposed to teach children and the ways you're supposed to
teach them, made him even more intense and frustrated. The closer we
got to unschooling, the better things became.
-
With unschooling, children are encouraged to, and actively supported as, they follow their interests, rather than a set curriculum. What advantages have you seen to learning this way?
Well it's really amazing
how much richer their learning experience actually is. I mean,
even the best, most well thought out, integrated curriculum is
still limited by the fact that it's something that's imposed
on another person from the outside. In schools you see that
all the time as the “is this going to be on the test?”
phenomenon. Homeschool parents know this from those times you
come up with a really, really great idea and your kids still
say “are we done? Can I go play now?” But even more than
that, there's an extent to which just creating a learning plan
limits where learning is likely to go.
Natural curiosity doesn't have those same limits. And some people are naturally curious enough, or... I don't know maybe intellectually subversive enough to overcome educational limits. But when curiosity itself is the starting point, learning expands in all sorts of unanticipated directions.
Natural curiosity doesn't have those same limits. And some people are naturally curious enough, or... I don't know maybe intellectually subversive enough to overcome educational limits. But when curiosity itself is the starting point, learning expands in all sorts of unanticipated directions.
That's actually an idea that comes
right out of the system of education itself – and I mean system in
the grand, western-cultural sense not just your local school system.
I've just been reading Montaigne's essay On The Education of
Children, which was written in 1580, okay? And some of his complaints
about education are the same basic complaints we have about schools
today – that kids are memorizing this “basic set” of
information and then not really using it for anything. And he's
quoting people like Plutarch and Aristotle, right? So this idea that
there's a basic set of stuff to learn goes way back, along with the
idea that maybe there's nothing so special about it, and that it's
really better to learn from life. Montaigne talks about that – heck
Socrates talks about that. It's not a new idea. It's not even a new
idea when applied to children.
The more interesting question – to
me, anyway – is why do we cling to this idea of a generalized body
of knowledge? And I think the main reason, as parents, is that we
think it's safe. As long as we're staying within bounds, we can't be
accused of doing our kids a disservice.
Stepping out of bounds feels risky. It
is risky. And I think that's why unschooling can be so attractive to
parents with kids who've had a rough time in school or homeschooling
– we've seen first hand that there are risks to sticking with the
system, too.
All that being said -
One of the really fascinating things
about kids following the various rabbit trails of natural curiosity,
is that they actually do pick up a lot of “basic skills and
information” along the way. And they do that because some of those
basic skills really are useful and empowering, and that's a big
motivator for learning.
- 5. comparison #3: school’s focus on the compulsory school years vs unschooling’s focus on lifelong learningUnschooling and the concept of lifelong learning weave together so tightly, and leaving behind the idea that childhood is for learning and adulthood is for living can have a profound impact on everyone in an unschooling family, parents included. Have you found that to be true?
Well, I've always been
interested in adult learning – lifelong learning – so the
part that's been more profound for me has been the idea that
the very messy, convoluted, interactive ways that adults
explore their interests actually does work for kids. Even
though their brains aren't adult brains.
That's something that
was a sticking point for me, and I think it is for a lot of
parents because we get told over and over that kids aren't
like adults, their brains aren't like adult brains, so we
can't treat them like... normal people. You see that a lot
lately with teens – how your teenager's brain makes them
demented, so you shouldn't be too nice to them.
One of the really fascinating things about radical unschooling, in particular, is how it manages to integrate the very real effects of human development with the equally real social and motivational factors that make up a big part of how learning works.
One of the really fascinating things about radical unschooling, in particular, is how it manages to integrate the very real effects of human development with the equally real social and motivational factors that make up a big part of how learning works.
And for me, learning
about that has affected the way I see my own learning process
and made me a better learner. Thinking about the ways that
human beings of all ages are social, for instance, and how we
learn from and about social situations, has made it easier for
me to learn from other people. That was something I definitely
didn't learn in school, but I learned about through
unschooling.
Well obviously, it's a
much richer experience. I mean, that's why Socrates wandered
around town making a pest of himself asking people questions.
That's not new.
And really, even though
putting kids in classrooms can feel safe on a parental level,
we know that trying to adapt kids to that kind of dull,
sterile environment doesn't work very well. That's the whole
driving force behind alternative education and even
conventional educational reform. We know the classroom isn't a
great environment.
One of the real
tragedies of the push to get kids in school sooner and
standardize education more, is that, culturally, we've lost or
love of... the idea of kids like Tom Sawyer. The kid who
really, obviously, learns more outside of the classroom than
in it is no longer a valued cultural trope. Today kids like
that get diagnoses so that they can be better molded to fit
in.
My daughter's kind of
atypical, so I'm really glad she has never had to adapt to the
classroom environment, because I think it would have been a
nightmare for her. She didn't even think much of the few
classes we did try and she's really sensitive to... so many of
the things she'd run into in school. Unless she managed to get
a run of really, really sympathetic teachers she'd probably
have shut down pretty hard, and might not be considered all
that high functioning. Instead...eh... she's very introverted,
not much of a talker, she has some quirks and sensitivities,
but none of those are defects. They're just the way she is,
you know. Kind of like... to use another kid-trope, Wednesday
Adams. She's kind of a weird kid, from a weird family, but
that's not a bad thing. She's happy being who she is. I don't
think she'd have that if she'd gone to school. In school,
she'd be maladapted. Out in the world, she has friends who are
like her and friends who aren't like her, older, younger, all
over the country. She likes her comfort zone, but she can step
out of it when she chooses to – and she does.
Testing is one of the
worst ways to evaluate what someone actually knows.
Even educators know that – it's one of the things they
complain about. I see testing as one of those things people do
to feel safe. You can point to a test score and say: see?
We're not just screwing around, here. Education is happening.
And that's what makes experiential learning harder to evaluate – there aren't necessarily a lot of easy markers you can use as proof. It's arguably one of the down sides of unschooling, at least in the short term.
And that's what makes experiential learning harder to evaluate – there aren't necessarily a lot of easy markers you can use as proof. It's arguably one of the down sides of unschooling, at least in the short term.
In the longer term, you
find out what your kids know by living with them – having
conversations, doing things together, sharing opinions,
telling jokes. Sandra Dodd has a comment on her website about
the value of learning in terms of being able to get more jokes
– and humor is really a fantastic way to know what someone
else knows and how they understand the world. You know that
feeling when your kid is finally old enough to get a certain
kind of joke – whether it's a pun, or ironic humor, or...
sexual humor. Unschooling is pretty rich in those kinds of
moments, or moments when our kids introduce us to something
new, or come up with some insight that just blows us away.
- 8. While conventional wisdom tells us that children resist learning and need to motivated to do it, unschooling parents see something very different. Why don’t unschooled kids hate learning?
I actually think curiosity is
one of the driving forces of human nature. And I think people miss
that because there's a certain amount of intellectual snobbery around
pop culture, for instance, but even there you can see an endless font
of human curiosity. People want to learn things, even if it's just
who's sleeping with who. We wanna know.
And one of the great strengths
of unschooling is that we don't prioritize some kinds of learning
over others. It's okay if what your kid wants to know is all the
evolutions of all the Pokemon. Or all the lines to Barbie Fairytopia.
Or how to draw Shadow the Hedgehog just like in the picture.
There's a lot of pressure on
parents to steer kids away from certain interests, but that kind of
steering is exactly what leads kids to find learning frustrating.
They get told that the things they find wonderful aren't worth
learning. So why learn anything at all?
But it turns out that when we
let personality drive natural curiosity, even when it's driving in
the direction of trivia, learning itself gets a lot bigger than we
expect.
One of the big reliefs of
finally getting to pull Ray out of school was getting to see his love
of learning come back. When he could learn about spray-painting
skulls on skateboards, that one little thing spread out in so many
different directions it was just amazing. Just buying some spray
paint ended up involving learning about the legal system as applied
to teenagers... because he wasn't allowed to buy it on his own, an
adult had to buy it for him. One little dollar fifty can of paint and
the kid learned more about systems of justice and the social contract
than all his previous education combined. And it was fun. And
interesting. And he got what he wanted.
A lot of times parents want to
know how to make learning fun and interesting. But it turns
out that learning is already fun and interesting. It's wired
into our heads that way. When we don't prioritize giving quizzes on
Article 3 of the Constitution over buying spray paint, learning stays
fun and interesting.
And that's one of the ways that
“general set of knowledge” we talked about earlier gets picked up
along the way, while unschooling. Basic civics comes up through
interacting with the real world.
I think parents come in looking
for rules and recipes because parenting tends to be framed that way
in general. If you follow the recipe, you'll be safe... even if it
doesn't taste very good.
Unschooling could be said to
use a recipe as a jumping off point, but the funny thing is, the
recipe itself isn't about unschooling, it's about people and
relationships. Part of the recipe is knowing that people like to
learn. Part of the recipe is knowing that people are social – we
care about other people and like to learn from other people. Part of
the recipe is knowing that there's a difference between the external
world and the individual experience, a difference between the self
and the other. It's a complicated recipe – the recipe of human
nature!
That's why it's so hard to give
a quick-and-dirty definition of unschooling because at it's core,
unschooling is about what it means to be people, living and learning
together. It's something that a lot of people have talked and written
about that over the centuries with regards to adults. But what's new
and different about unschooling is that we bring kids into the
conversation as people, too.
When sometimes people say that
unschooling is about treating kids like adults they don't mean making
them pay rent and letting them drive the car, they mean bringing that
kind of understanding that we extend to other adults into our
relationships with kids.
They're not the same as we are,
but the fact that there's a difference between the world as it is and
the world as it's perceived still matters. They're not the same as we
are, but they're still social beings. They're not the same as we are,
but then again, neither is anyone else.
- 10. I’d love to talk about choice for a moment. I think one of the key aspects at the root of learning through unschooling is giving our children the space and support to make the choices that they think will work for them. What’s your perspective on the importance of choice in our unschooling lives?
I talked about this a little in
regards to the question about why don't unschooling kids hate
learning. Choice is a big deal, there.
But, to kind of take the
question in a slightly different direction, because one of the really
interesting things about people getting to make choices is that
there's more of a chance to make mistakes – and that's really
important. It's one of the things that scares the pants off
parents – we really, really don't want our kids to make mistakes,
especially not some of the mistakes we made. We'd really
rather just give our kids the answers to those life questions so they
don't have to go through that same awkward process we did. We're very
altruistic in that way. Unfortunately, our kids don't want our
pre-lived experiences, they want their own process. They want to
follow the rabbit trails of curiosity, even though some of those
trails drop you into pool of tears or the Court of the Red Queen.
That's actually one of the surprising things about curiosity and
learning – that making mistakes, even sometimes painful mistakes,
is an important part of the process. Sometimes it's even a desirable
part of the process.
Which isn't to say we should
set our kids up to fail – this is another aspect of choice as it
pertains to learning. There's a difference between choosing to take a
risk and having it dumped on you. There's an actual difference in
what you learn from the experience.
That's something parents get
stuck on all the time. We want to be able push our kids to do certain
things so they learn how great they are – and sometimes it seems to
work. What ends up working, though, has to do with that difference
between world and the self – when kids feel like they're getting to
choose and we're helping them, they can feel empowered. When they
feel like they're being thrown into the shark tank... not so much!
That's something that comes up with atypical kids a lot – how much
to “let” them choose to move out of their comfort zone. As if
their own feelings about choice are something we can “let” them
have. It's still, ultimately their choice, one that they're going to
make based on their own internal accounting. We don't get to pick
that. We don’t get to say “now you can decide to be brave, my
child.” They're their own people, no matter what.
What we can do, as parents, is
to listen to our kids about what choices are important to them right
now and how they want us to help them. They don't always know, but
that's okay, too. It's okay to be learning with your kids, and
figuring things out together. That's something that actually makes
sense to kids on a deep level – because people are social. Learning
together makes sense.
- 11. One theme that has come up pretty regularly on the podcast is that, in the end, unschooling thrives when we have strong, connected, and trusting relationships with our children. You recently wrote something I loved: “It may help to step back from the idea that parenting is a job. It's a relationship, first and foremost.” Can you expand on that?
The idea that parenting is a
job goes hand in hand with the idea that parenting is about teaching.
And those are ideas that distract us from our kids' “personhood”
I guess you could say. On an intellectual level, I think any modern,
western parent would say they think children are people and should be
respected and treated as such, but because of the ways conventional
parenting is framed, we're bad at that. We don't listen to our kids
very well. We don't take their thoughts and feelings seriously. We
trivialize their interests. If you look at random parenting articles
and advice, a lot of it is around getting kids to do and be what we
want them to do and be. That's the job of parenting.
Unschooling re-conceptualizes
the whole parent-child relationship as a relationship first and
foremost, and that changes... so many things. I mean, what if you
were to describe having a baby as getting a new best friend rather
than starting a new job? How does that change your whole attitude
about this other person? And naturally, you want to do right by your
new best friend. You want to be a good friend. You want this
friendship to be strong and healthy and one you can value life long,
even knowing that people grow and change and that different people
bring different things to relationships. That feels really different
than trying to figure out how many diaper changes until your new
employee will be ready to take out the trash without supervision.
It's a really different set of priorities.
And the great thing is, it
works. It doesn't somehow ruin your kids to be a really good friend
to them. It doesn't unfit them for life, or any of the other things
they warn you about in the parent job training handbooks. It's okay
to be friends with your kid. And it feels sooooooo much better than
parenting as a job. I have a job. I get to go home to my kid and be a
friend. That's awesome.
No comments:
Post a Comment